The BBC Tried to Recruit Riz Ahmed as a Spy. It Sent Three 'Journalists' to Spy on Scotland's Liberation Movement’s Decolonisation Conference at the United Nations in Geneva and Broadcast Nothing. This Is What a Colonial Intelligence Apparatus Looks Like.

Still Yours For Scotland | decolonise.scot

The BBC is not a broadcaster that occasionally interfaces with intelligence services. It is, beyond serious dispute, an intelligence apparatus that broadcasts. In September 2025, it sent three of its World Service journalists to spy on Scotland's liberation movement at the United Nations in Geneva and broadcast nothing. Not a line. Not a fragment. The silence was not editorial discretion. It was colonial intelligence management, the same institutional logic that led a senior BBC executive to attempt to recruit Oscar-winning actor Riz Ahmed as a spy, a revelation that broke in May 2026 and whose implications extend far beyond one actor's biography into the architecture of what the BBC actually is and what it is actually for. Understanding what happened in Geneva, why the BBC was there, and why it broadcast nothing requires understanding that architecture and what the English colonial state is so terrified of losing that it deploys its national broadcaster as an intelligence operation against Scotland's liberation movement at the United Nations.

The Revelation That Changes Everything

On 9 April 2026, at a live event for Zeteo (@zeteo_news on X), the media platform founded by journalist Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan on X), Oscar-winning British-Pakistani actor Riz Ahmed (@rizwanahmed) made a revelation whose implications extend far beyond his own biography.

Ahmed told the audience that he had been approached by British intelligence services three times. The first time was when he returned from filming Road to Guantanamo, intelligence officers took him into a side room at Luton Airport, put him in an arm lock, threatened to break his arm, took his phone, and asked him: "Did you become an actor to further the Muslim struggle?". The second approach came through a family friend. The third time was from "someone senior, high up at the BBC" who had "just left the BBC." Ahmed did not name the individual. He did not need to. The institutional implication was stated with precision.

Sangita Myska (@SangitaMyska), journalist and presenter, formerly of LBC, BBC Radio 4 Today Programme, and BBC TV News, reported the revelation directly on X: "At a live event for @zeteo_news with @mehdirhasan the actor Riz Ahmed says British Secret services tried to recruit him three times as an intelligence officer. The final time, the offer came from a senior BBC Executive (who he doesn't name)."

Novara Media's Aaron Bastani (@aaronbastani; @novaramedia) stated what the British media establishment declined to say: "Riz Ahmed says someone from the BBC tried to recruit him…for the security services. You have to be incredibly naive if you don't think this stuff happens quite regularly. It's a regime broadcaster. That's not even a criticism; that's just what it is."

This characterisation aligns precisely with journalist Nury Vittachi's (@NuryVittachi) documented conclusion on X. The BBC's independence from government and intelligence services is not a factual description of an institutional reality but a brand claim whose credibility the documentary record cannot sustain. The BBC's editorial alignment with state intelligence priorities is not a conspiracy but an architectural feature

Barry Malone (@malonebarry); journalist and commentator, formerly Al Jazeera executive producer and Reuters correspondent in Africa and the Middle East; saw the video posted by a news platform representing the Muslim community @s2jnews and said simply: "The BBC mention here, wow."

What the BBC Actually Is: The Intelligence Architecture

The relationship between the BBC and Anglo-British intelligence services, those of the English colonial state, is not a conspiracy theory. It is a documented institutional architecture confirmed by the UK Government's own parliamentary evidence.

As Vittachi shows in detail on X, in 1939 the BBC met with what would become the CIA, then the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), and divided the world between them for intelligence monitoring purposes. The CIA took China, Japan, and Latin America. The BBC took the Soviet Union, Africa, and the Middle East. The result was the creation of BBC Monitoring (BBCM); a division that still operates today, processing approximately 25% of global media while the CIA processes the remaining 75%, gathering material for Anglo-British intelligence services as its primary institutional function.

This is not historical footnote. The UK Government's own written evidence submitted to the House of Commons Defence Committee and Foreign Affairs Committee in October 2016, now in the public record, confirms the relationship with forensic precision. "The six government 'key customers' of BBCM," it states, "are the Ministry of Defence, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Cabinet Office and three Security and Intelligence Agencies." Those three agencies are MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, whose Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG), exposed by Edward Snowden in 2013, this blog has previously documented possesses operational capabilities including the creation of false social media identities, coordinated disinformation campaigns, and the infiltration of civil society organisations.

The BBC and UK intelligence services share a desktop tool ("Quickfire") that alerts newsrooms and BBCM to urgent breaking news simultaneously. BBCM maintains a dedicated web portal ("BBCM Portal") through which its intelligence "customers" access multimedia reporting on mobile phones and tablets. The BBC's annual intelligence priorities are integrated, the parliamentary document confirms, "into the existing cross-government annual process to review and update requirements and priorities for secret intelligence."

BBCM even has a burden-sharing agreement with the CIA's Open Source Enterprise (OSE), co-located for decades at Caversham Park in Berkshire: "For decades the two organisations have operated a burden-sharing agreement, with country coverage allotted to each, and the products shared." The BBC and the CIA share intelligence products. This is in the English colonial state government's own parliamentary submission; not a whistleblower's disclosure or a conspiracy theory. It is what the English colonial state submitted in writing to its own parliamentary committees as a straightforward description of how its national broadcaster operates.

Vittachi further documents a specific operational case that illustrates precisely what this BBC-intelligence partnership produces in practice. While BBC News presents itself as an independent media outlet, it directly partnered with US spy agencies in pushing what Vittachi describes as the "Uyghur genocide hoax", a disinformation campaign created by the National Endowment for Democracy, which the Trump administration itself defined as a group that works to "destabilize sovereign governments." When data showed the opposite of a genocide, the campaign switched to a Uyghur "slave labour" narrative, which BBC News again distributed. The fictions were so patently inadequate that even human rights campaigners complained: "The BBC should know better," said Gene Bunin of the Xinjiang Transitional Database. The BBC is an active distributor of intelligence-originated disinformation dressed as independent journalism, a pattern directly relevant to its treatment of Scotland's liberation movement at the United Nations.

Vittachi also documents the BBC's use of a "yellow filter" and other visual manipulation tools to make images and videos of China appear polluted, not a conspiracy theory but a documented practice. Independent journalist Brian Berletic (@brianjberletic) demonstrated clearly how the BBC doctored a specific image of China, turning live green trees black. After the exposure was published, the BBC replaced the doctored image with the original picture without admission of guilt or explanation. Vittachi further cites independent academic research from King's College London examining BBC News reports on China across three consecutive periods (September to December 2021, August to November 2022, and December 2022 to March 2023) finding coverage that was overwhelmingly negative: 4% positive in the first period, 2% positive in the second, and 1% positive in the third. The study, published under the title "Shaping the Policy Debate", established a pattern of systematic negative framing indistinguishable, in its structural features, from state-directed information management. Individual BBC journalists can, as Vittachi acknowledges, produce honest and valuable reporting. "But on big topics with a geopolitical angle," he concludes, "don't believe a word". Scotland's Geneva conference was precisely such a topic.

The BBC is not a broadcaster that happens to have a monitoring function. It is an intelligence apparatus that happens to broadcast. Vittachi also documents a piece of history the BBC would prefer forgotten. In December 1968, an investigative reporter at the Russian newspaper Izvestia published a detailed report naming high-profile BBC and mainstream media journalists as intelligence agents, providing their names, codenames, handlers, and photographs of documents confirming the details; including a specific list of musical melodies that BBC presenters could play to signal authenticity to MI6 officers operating in the field. The western media dismissed the claims as Soviet propaganda. More than forty years later, in 2013, BBC reporters themselves interviewed intelligence historians who confirmed that the Russian scoop was real, as were the documents . As Vittachi notes on X with characteristic precision: "the wholesale dismissal of anything produced by Russia (or Chinese or Iranian) state media in the west continues today, even by BBC, which is itself financed by the state and politically compromised".

Riz Ahmed's revelation that a senior BBC executive tried to recruit him as a spy is not a scandal in this context. It is the institutional architecture performing as designed. The BBC-MI5 relationship has a documented institutional history that predates Geneva by decades. From the late 1930s until 1984, MI5 stationed a permanent intelligence officer inside the BBC to vet editorial applicants. The personnel records of anyone deemed politically suspect were stamped with a distinctive green upward-facing arrow resembling a Christmas tree (the "Christmas tree files") whose effect was the systematic blacklisting of applicants across the BBC's entire editorial operation. The practice was officially denied until The Observer exposed it in 1985 following a leak from BBC insider Mike Fentiman. The files were subsequently destroyed in the 1990s, not released or not independently examined, but destroyed (Leigh and Lashmar, The Observer, 1985; Hollingsworth and Norton-Taylor, Blacklist, 1988). The categories of those blacklisted included members of left-wing parties, trade unionists, and, of direct relevance to Scotland's liberation movement, anyone associated with organisations deemed subversive to the Anglo-British constitutional order. Scottish nationalism, under this operational framework, is precisely the category of political activity that the BBC-MI5 vetting apparatus was designed to exclude from broadcast influence. The three BBC World Service journalists who attended Liberation Scotland's UN conference in Geneva and broadcast nothing were not acting outside the BBC's institutional tradition. They were operating entirely within it. Scotland is, for the English colonial state, the number one national security question; the existential territorial challenge whose resolution would end the fiction of the "United Kingdom" and expose the colonial relationship for what international law has already established it to be; triggering the most significant constitutional and geopolitical transformation in the history of the English colonial state since Irish independence. MI5, MI6, GCHQ, the BBC, the FCDO, the British Council, and the academic networks this blog has documented in relation to SP Paper 1030 are all, in their different institutional registers, deployed against this single threat. Scotland's liberation movement is not paranoid for recognising this. It would be naive not to.

This is not without historical precedent in English colonial practice. During the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya, the anti-colonial liberation movement that the English colonial state suppressed with documented atrocities including torture, detention camps, and mass killings, the BBC World Service was deployed as a direct instrument of colonial counter-insurgency; broadcasting colonial state narratives about the uprising as objective news while systematically suppressing the voices of the Kenyan liberation movement and its international supporters. Elkins (2005) established the full scale of what she calls "British" (the English colonial state) colonial atrocities in Kenya, documents how the colonial information apparatus, of which the BBC was a central component, functioned to maintain the colonial narrative of legitimate governance against barbaric insurgency, making the colonised people's liberation struggle invisible to the international community at precisely the moment when international visibility was most consequential for their cause. A critical analytical note is necessary here. Elkins, like virtually the entire scholarly literature on the Anglo-British Empire, uses "British" as the operative descriptor, a usage that itself reproduces the colonial disinformation architecture this blog has consistently challenged. The empire was not British. It was English. It was conceived, directed, financed, and administered by the English colonial state that had already annexed Scotland, Ireland, and Wales before exporting its colonial model across the world. Scotland was not a partner in the empire. It was itself a colony whose annexation in 1707 provided the foundational template (ethnic cleansing, linguicide, resource extraction, constitutional suppression) for what the English colonial state subsequently deployed in Kenya, India, Ireland, the Caribbean, and across the colonised world. When Elkins documents "British" colonial atrocities in Kenya, she is documenting English colonial atrocities, the same colonial power that today deploys the BBC against Liberation Scotland at the United Nations, that reserves broadcasting as a colonial matter under the Scotland Act 1998, that assets-strips Scotland while calling Scotland a voluntary partner in a union of equals. Scotland and Kenya were both victims of the same colonial state. The BBC that silenced the Kenyan liberation movement and the BBC that silenced Scotland's liberation movement at the United Nations are the same institution serving the same colonial master. "Britain" is the brand. England is the colonial power. Scotland is still its colony. What the BBC did to Liberation Scotland at the United Nations in Geneva in September 2025; observe, spy, record, and then broadcast nothing; is the same colonial information management applied to a different liberation movement in a different century. The mechanism is identical. The institutional logic is unchanged. The BBC's relationship to English colonial power has not evolved since Kenya. It has merely been updated for the digital age.

Geneva, September 2025: Scotland at the United Nations

In September 2025, Liberation Scotland, Scotland's liberation movement, formally recognised in the United Nations system through document United Nations Human Rights Council A/HRC/61/NGO/210, held a historic conference titled "Scotland's Path to Self-Determination Under International Law" at the Palais des Nations in Geneva, the headquarters of the United Nations Human Rights Council, during the 60th Session of the Human Rights Council. The conference is listed on the official UN website at https://indico.un.org/event/1019338/overview. The conference was actually held 0n 18 September 2025, 11 years after the non-binding rigged colonial "referendum" organised by the English colonial state.

The conference was chaired by Junius Ho Kwan-yiu; barrister, former President of the Law Society of Hong Kong, sitting member of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong SAR and member of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), China's top political advisory body, which operates under the direction of the Chinese Communist Party; as Chairman of IPLSA, the International Pro Bono Legal Services Association, which holds UN ECOSOC Special Consultative Status granted in December 2022. IPLSA recently submitted document UN Human Rights Council A/HRC/61/NGO/210 with Liberation Scotland to the UN Human Rights Council's 61st session, the document now formally before the Secretary-General of the United Nations that identifies Scotland as an English colony or a territory under English colonial sovereignty.

Keynote speakers included Professor George Katrougalos, the UN's Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order, former foreign minister of Greece, Vice-President of the International Association of Constitutional Law, who confirmed publicly and on the record at the UN's own headquarters that "the people of Scotland has a constitutional right to determine its political future." Scotland was, for the first time in the modern era, formally placing its self-determination claim in the international legal space where the English colonial state's constitutional arrangements have no jurisdiction.

Three journalists from the BBC World Service attended the entire conference from start to finish. They observed every intervention, every video, every legal argument, every statement by international experts. They were refused permission to film the proceedings, a decision that is itself analytically significant, removing the possibility of footage circulating independently. They were permitted to ask two questions at the close and to conduct short interviews afterwards.

I was interviewed among others after the event. Before the event began I had presented the BBC journalists with hard evidence of England's colonial domination of Scotland's identity: documentation showing that the FCDO, the British Council, and the BBC itself routinely call Scots "English" and Scotland "England" in the languages of countries representing more than three billion people; including the official email of the English ambassador to Indonesia endorsing this suppression of identity. Confronted with these documents, the BBC journalists could not offer a rebuttal. They understood, even if they did not admit, that the state parading as the "United Kingdom" is in reality England, forcing the English name onto every other nation under its power.

Then the BBC journalists erased everything.

The BBC World Service broadcast nothing. Not a report or a line. Not a fragment of what happened at the United Nations in Geneva, where Scotland's liberation movement had just addressed the international community at the highest available international level, where the UN's own Independent Expert had confirmed Scotland's constitutional right to self-determination, and where document UN Human Rights Council A/HRC/61/NGO/210 had been formally placed before the Secretary-General. Three journalists dispatched to a major UN conference on Scotland's right to self-determination. Total silence. This is my original post published on X.

The Infiltration: The Consultant Who Changed Sides

The Geneva operation did not occur in isolation. At approximately the same period, Liberation Scotland's own consultant at the time began, suddenly and inexplicably, to go against Liberation Scotland's positions and to defend colonial powers' interests at precisely the moments when Liberation Scotland's international campaign was gaining its greatest traction at the United Nations. The pattern is textbook: a trusted insider whose positions shift at the moment of maximum strategic sensitivity and whose new positions align consistently with the colonial state's interests. His access to Liberation Scotland's internal discussions had been extensive. (Liberation Scotland managed to sort all this out legally.)

JTRIG's documented operational capabilities explicitly include "infiltration of civil society organisations" and the "strategic disruption of oppositional networks" to produce "demoralisation, distrust, and fragmentation from within." Whether the mechanism was deliberate infiltration, intelligence-managed pressure, or the colonial epistemic cage operating through institutional co-optation, the consequence was identical to what JTRIG's documents describe as an operational objective: internal disruption at the moment of maximum external visibility.

The colonial statecraft playbook (observed in Ireland, in India, in Kenya, in Algeria, across the decolonising world) applied to Scotland's liberation movement in real time, in 2025, at the United Nations in Geneva. Scotland's liberation movement understands what this means. The English colonial state considers Liberation Scotland's international campaign serious enough to deploy these resources against it. That is not a cause for demoralisation but confirmation that the campaign is working. I can personally confirm that the English colonial state is all out against Scotland internationally.

Scotland Invented Television: The Colonial Irony That Explains Everything

There is a dimension to the BBC's systematic silencing of Scotland's decolonisation that transcends ordinary colonial indignity and enters the territory of historical farce, were its consequences for the Scottish people not so serious.

John Logie Baird, born in Helensburgh, Scotland on 13 August 1888, educated at the Royal Technical College in Glasgow, invented the world's first working television system, giving the first public demonstration of moving television images at the Royal Institution in London on 26 January 1926. The BBC used Baird's television technique to broadcast from 1929 to 1937. A Scotsman invented television. The BBC was built on a Scottish invention.

Under the Scotland Act 1998, the devolution settlement that the English colonial state wrongly presented as the fulfilment of Scotland's democratic aspirations, broadcasting is a reserved matter, explicitly excluded from the Scottish Parliament's competence. Section K of Schedule 5 to the Scotland Act 1998 states without ambiguity: "The subject-matter of the Broadcasting Acts 1990 and 1996 and the BBC, are reserved matters." Scotland's Parliament, the institution supposedly representing Scotland's self-governing aspirations, cannot legislate on broadcasting, cannot regulate the BBC, cannot require BBC executives to give evidence before its committees, and cannot hold the BBC to account for its conduct in Scotland; the BBC being absolutely hated in Scotland as a colonial channel and the voice of the English coloniser.

The nation whose son invented television has no control over its own broadcasting. The colonial power that erected a state broadcaster on Scottish intellectual foundations reserves the regulation of that broadcaster to itself and deploys it, as the Geneva operation demonstrates with documentary precision, as an instrument of colonial intelligence management against Scotland's liberation movement. In what conceivable "voluntary union of equals" does the nation that invented the medium of broadcasting have no say over its broadcasting? In what voluntary partnership does the colonised people have no independent national media while the colonial state's broadcaster is simultaneously their state broadcaster, an intelligence asset of MI5, MI6, and GCHQ, and the institution from whose senior ranks intelligence services recruit operatives? The question answers itself.

Scotland is the only nation in the world that invented television and is denied the right to control its own broadcasting by a colonial power that has weaponised that broadcasting against Scotland's liberation movement at the United Nations. This is not a democratic anomaly. It is a colonial relationship. The Scotland Act 1998 is its constitutional instrument.

The Colonial State's Terror: What the Silence in Geneva Reveals

The BBC's Geneva silence is not the absence of news but the presence of colonial power and it is evidence of the English colonial state's assessment of the threat that Liberation Scotland's international campaign represents.

The English colonial state controls Scotland's oil revenues, Scotland's gas revenues, Scotland's renewable energy infrastructure, Scotland's whisky excise duty, Scotland's fisheries, Scotland's water. It controls Scotland's nuclear weapons policy. Trident is stationed at Faslane, against the democratic will of Scotland's Parliament, because the English colonial state requires a Scottish base for its nuclear arsenal. It controls Scotland's foreign policy, Scotland's defence policy, Scotland's broadcasting, and through the colonial GERS methodology Scotland's fiscal self-understanding (a colonial scam to put it clearly). It has suppressed the McCrone Report for thirty years. It has deployed the GERS methodology as a political weapon to manufacture the appearance of Scottish economic dependency and conducted a managed colonial plebiscite in 2014 whose procedural deficiencies this blog has documented at length and whose foundational EU promise it destroyed within two years through Brexit. The reality is that the English colonial state steals hundreds of millions of pounds per year from Scotland.

Now document UN Human Rights Council A/HRC/61/NGO/210 is formally before the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Scotland has addressed the Committee of 24, the UN's principal decolonisation body, making it the first European nation to do so in the modern era. The UN's own Independent Expert has confirmed Scotland's constitutional right to self-determination on the record at the Palais des Nations. The international legal architecture of decolonisation has been formally activated. Annexation is demonstrated by Liberation Scotland with Professor Robert Black KC.

The English colonial state is terrified. That is what the Geneva operation reveals. Organisations whose liberation cause is genuinely irrelevant do not receive BBC World Service intelligence operations. The colonial power does not dispatch three journalists to monitor, profile, contain, and silence a movement that it does not consider a genuine threat to its colonial authority. The attempt to infiltrate Liberation Scotland's own consultant confirms the same assessment. The FCDO's, British Council's, and BBC's systematic misidentification of Scots as "English" and Scotland as "England" in countries representing more than three billion people is not administrative error. It is the colonial epistemic management apparatus functioning at global scale.

Scotland's decolonisation claim is now formally in the United Nations system. The English colonial state cannot suppress it there as it suppresses it through the BBC's Geneva silence, through the GERS methodology's fiscal fiction, through the Scotland Act's reservation of broadcasting to Westminster and through all its other colonial crimes in Scotland. The international legal space where document UN Human Rights Council A/HRC/61/NGO/210 operates is not subject to the English colonial state's editorial control.

The silence in Geneva spoke louder than anything the BBC World Service could have broadcast. It told the world that the English colonial state is afraid of Scotland's emancipation and liberation.

References and Sources

Ahmed, Riz (@rizwanahmed). Revelations about intelligence service recruitment approaches. Live event, Zeteo, New York, 9 April 2026. Reported by Sangita Myska (@SangitaMyska) and @s2jnews. Available at: https://x.com/s2jnews/status/2057506911650488476

Baird, John Logie. First public demonstration of television, Royal Institution, London, 26 January 1926. National Library of Scotland, Scottish Science Hall of Fame. Available at: https://digital.nls.uk/scientists/biographies/john-logie-baird/

Dorigné-Thomson, Christophe (@thomsonchris). "Three BBC 'Journalists' at Scotland's UN Conference in Geneva, Then Silence." X (formerly Twitter), September 2025. Available at: https://x.com/thomsonchris/status/1970528601238880705

Elkins, Caroline. Britain's Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya. London: Jonathan Cape, 2005. Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction, 2006.

Greenwald, Glenn, and Ryan Gallagher. "How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations." The Intercept, 24 February 2014. Available at: https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

Hollingsworth, Mark, and Richard Norton-Taylor. Blacklist: The Inside Story of Political Vetting. London: Hogarth Press, 1988.

IPLSA (International Pro Bono Legal Services Association). UN ECOSOC Special Consultative Status, granted December 2022. Founded and chaired by Junius Ho Kwan-yiu, barrister and member of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong SAR. Available at: https://www.iplsa.net/

Leigh, David, and Paul Lashmar. "The Blacklist in Room 105: Revealed -- How MI5 Vets BBC Staff." The Observer, 18 August 1985. Available at: https://www.cambridgeclarion.org/press_cuttings/mi5.bbc.page9_obs_18aug1985.html

Liberation Scotland with IPLSA. "Scotland's Path to Self-Determination Under International Law." Conference at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, September 2025. Official UN listing available at: https://indico.un.org/event/1019338/overview

Malone, Barry (@malonebarry). Response to @s2jnews video of Riz Ahmed. X (formerly Twitter), May 2026. Available at: https://x.com/malonebarry/status/2058198386520596653

Myska, Sangita (@SangitaMyska). Report on Riz Ahmed's Zeteo revelations. X (formerly Twitter), May 2026. Available at: https://x.com/SangitaMyska/status/2058489238753026077

Scotland Act 1998. Schedule 5, Section K: Broadcasting. Parliament of the United Kingdom. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/46/notes/division/5/5/11/4/20

Smith, David. "BBC Banned Communists in Purge." The Guardian, 5 March 2006. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/mar/05/broadcasting.bbc

"The Vetting Files: How the BBC Kept Out 'Subversives'." BBC News, 22 April 2018. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-43754737

UK Government. Written Evidence to the House of Commons Defence Committee and Foreign Affairs Committee on BBC Monitoring. October 2016. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/74950/pdf/

United Nations Human Rights Council. Document A/HRC/61/NGO/210. Submitted by IPLSA and Liberation Scotland. 61st Session, 2026.

Vittachi, Nury (@NuryVittachi). "A Top BBC Executive Pushed Oscar-Winning British Actor Riz Ahmed to Join Spy Agency MI6: Eight Important Points About the BBC's Relationship With Intelligence Services." X (formerly Twitter) / Friday News Project, May 2026. Available at: https://x.com/NuryVittachi/status/2058760322299887729